Home
Search
CFMOTO 300SS Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Features Comparison
CFMOTO 300SS Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
CFMOTO 300SS vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350: CFMOTO 300SS is priced at Tk 0 while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is the costlier one priced at Tk 340000. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is the fuel efficient one with a claimed mileage of 0 kmpl while the claimed figure for CFMOTO 300SS is 0 Kmpl.-1722236831.webp) |
-1722236710.webp) |
|
|---|---|---|
| User Ratings |  0 / 10 |
0 / 10 |
| Name | CFMOTO 300SS | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
| Brand | CFMoto | Royal Enfield |
| Brand Origin | ||
| Made/Assemble in | ||
| Engine Type | Single-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4 valves | 349.34cc BS6 engine |
| Displacement(CC) | 292 | 349.34 |
| MaxPower | 29 hp @ 8,750 rpm | 20.2 bhp @ 6,100 rpm |
| MaxTorque | 25 Nm @ 7,250 rpm | 27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm |
| Mileage (Company) * | 0 kmpl | 0 kmpl |
| Mileage (User)* | +/- 0 kmpl | +/- 0 kmpl |
| Top Speed * | 0 kmph | 114 kmph |
| Gears | 6-speed | 5 Speed Manual |
| Weight | 165 Kg | 177 Kg |
| Seat Height | 780mm | 800mm |
| Fuel Tank | 12 Liter | 13 Liter |
| Brakes (F/R) | 292 mm single disc Continental ABS, dual-channel, 220 mm single disc Continental ABS, dual-channel | Disc 300 mm, Drum 153 mm |
| Tires (F/R) | , | , |
| Suspensions (F/R) | Upside down telescopic fork, hydraulic damping, Mono suspension, center aligned | Telescopic, 41mm forks, 130mm travel, Twin tube emulsion shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload |
| Good Sides | ||
| Bad Sides | ||
| Services | ||
| Showrooms / Dealers: | 1 | 1 |
| Price | Tk 0 | Tk 340000 |
| Full Features | Click Here for full specs | Click Here for full specs |
