Home
Search
Royal Enfield Himalayan Vs Triumph Bonneville T100 Features Comparison
Royal Enfield Himalayan Vs Triumph Bonneville T100
Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Triumph Bonneville T100: Royal Enfield Himalayan is priced at Tk 0 while Triumph Bonneville T100 is the one priced at Tk 0. Triumph Bonneville T100 is the more fuel efficient one with a claimed mileage of 68 kmpl while the claimed figure for Royal Enfield Himalayan is 0 Kmpl. |
 |
|
|---|---|---|
| User Ratings |  0 / 10 |
0 / 10 |
| Name | Royal Enfield Himalayan | Triumph Bonneville T100 |
| Brand | Royal Enfield | Triumph |
| Brand Origin | ||
| Made/Assemble in | ||
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, Air-cooled | Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin |
| Displacement(CC) | 411 | |
| MaxPower | 24.3 bhp @ 6,500 rpm | 7400rpm |
| MaxTorque | 32 Nm @ 4,500 rpm | 80 Nm@3750 rpm |
| Mileage (Company) * | 0 kmpl | 68 kmpl |
| Mileage (User)* | +/- 0 kmpl | +/- 0 kmpl |
| Top Speed * | 120 kmph | 0 kmph |
| Gears | 5 Speed | 5 speed |
| Weight | 199 Kg | 228 Kg |
| Seat Height | 800mm | 790mm |
| Fuel Tank | 15 Liter | 14.5 Liter |
| Brakes (F/R) | 300 mm disc, 2-Piston,floting caliper, 240 mm disc, single,piston floting caliper | Brembo front caliper and Nissin rear caliper, with, Disc Brake |
| Tires (F/R) | , | , |
| Suspensions (F/R) | Telescopic, 41 mm forks, 200 mm travel, Monoshock with linkage, 180 mm wheel travel | 41mm cartridge forks with rubber gaitors, and twin rear suspension units, Twin RSU’s, with pre-load adjustment |
| Good Sides | ||
| Bad Sides | ||
| Services | ||
| Showrooms / Dealers: | 1 | 0 |
| Price | Tk 0 | Tk 0 |
| Full Features | Click Here for full specs | Click Here for full specs |
